Policy
Related Reports
-
Oil Crops Outlook: March 2013
-
Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Trade
-
Resources, Policies, and Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa
-
Oil Crops Outlook: February 2013
-
USDA Agricultural Projections to 2022
-
Rising Grain Exports by the Former Soviet Union Region
-
Rice Outlook: January 2013
-
Cotton and Hydropower in Central Asia: How Resource Competition Affects Trade
-
Southeast Asia’s Rice Surplus
-
Vegetables and Pulses Outlook; December 2012
-
Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Trade: November 2012
-
Rice Outlook: November 2012
-
Economic Policy and Cotton in Uzbekistan
-
Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: October 2012
-
Rice Outlook: October 2012
-
Vegetables and Pulses Outlook: September 2012
-
Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook: September 2012
-
Wheat Outlook: September 2012
-
Rice Outlook: September 2012
-
Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Trade: August 2012
-
Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook: August 2012
-
Wheat Outlook: August 2012
-
Rice Outlook: August 2012
-
Reciprocal Trade Agreements: Impacts on U.S. and Foreign Suppliers in Commodity and Manufactured Food Markets
-
China’s Market for Distillers Dried Grains and the Key Influences on Its Longer Run Potential
-
Dynamic PEATSim Model Documenting Its Use in Analyzing Global Commodity Markets
-
Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook: July 2012
-
Rice Outlook: July 2012
-
International Food Security Assessment, 2012-22
-
Policy, Technology, and Efficiency of Brazilian Agriculture
-
Vegetables and Pulses Outlook: June 2012
-
Indonesia’s Modern Food Retail Sector: Interaction With Changing Food Consumption and Trade Patterns
-
Estimating the Range of Food-Insecure Households in India
-
Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: May 2012
-
Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook: May 2012
-
U.S. Net Textile and Apparel Imports Decline in 2011
-
USDA Agricultural Projections to 2021
-
China’s Volatile Pork Industry
-
Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: January 2012
-
Long-Term Growth Prospects for Wheat Production in Afghanistan
-
Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide
-
Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: December 2011
-
Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: October 2011
-
Trade, the Expanding Mexican Beef Industry, and Feedlot and Stocker Cattle Production in Mexico
-
Wheat Flour Price Shocks and Household Food Security in Afghanistan
-
The Expansion of Modern Grocery Retailing and Trade in Developing Countries
-
Brazil’s Ethanol Industry: Looking Forward
-
Brazil’s Cotton Industry: Economic Reform and Development
-
Reciprocal Trade Agreements: Impacts on Bilateral Trade Expansion and Contraction in the World Agricultural Marketplace
-
International Evidence on Food Consumption Patterns: An Update Using 2005 International Comparison Program Data
-
Peru: An Emerging Exporter of Fruits and Vegetables
-
The U.S. and Mexican Dry Bean Sectors
-
Japan’s Beef Market
-
Food Security Assessment, 2010-20
-
Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook: April 2010
-
Growth and Equity Effects of Agricultural Marketing Efficiency Gains in India
-
Feed Outlook: December 2009
-
The Economics of Agricultural and Wildlife Smuggling
-
U.S. Cotton Prices and the World Cotton Market: Forecasting and Structural Change
-
What the 2008/2009 World Economic Crisis Means for Global Agricultural Trade
-
Trade and Development When Exports Lack Diversification: A Case Study from Malawi
-
Imports From China and Food Safety Issues
-
Food Security Assessment, 2008-09
-
Russia’s Growing Agricultural Imports: Causes and Outlook
-
China's Ongoing Agricultural Modernization: Challenges Remain After 30 Years of Reform
-
USDA Agricultural Projections to 2018
-
Declining Orange Consumption in Japan: Generational Changes or Something Else?
-
Colombia: A New Ethanol Producer on the Rise?
-
Food Safety and Imports: An Analysis of FDA Import Refusal Reports
-
The EU Sugar Policy Regime and Implications of Reform
-
The Environment for Agricultural and Agribusiness Investment in India
-
Food Security Assessment, 2007
-
Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook: March 2008
-
USDA Agricultural Projections to 2017
-
China’s Cotton Supply and Demand: Issues and Impact on the World Market
-
How Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N1) Has Affected World Poultry-Meat Trade
-
Beef Production, Markets, and Trade in Argentina and Uruguay: An Overview
-
Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook: September 2007
-
Global Growth, Macroeconomic Change, and U.S. Agricultural Trade
-
China Currency Appreciation Could Boost U.S. Agricultural Exports
-
Indian Wheat and Rice Sector Policies and the Implications of Reform
-
USDA Agricultural Projections to 2016
-
Demand for Food Quantity and Quality in China
-
Food Security Assessment 2005, GFA 17
-
The Role of Policy and Industry Structure in India's Oilseed Markets
-
Trade Liberalization in International Dairy Markets: Estimated Impacts
-
China's Rising Fruit and Vegetable Exports Challenge U.S. Industries
-
Prospects for India's Emerging Apple Market
-
Resolution of the U.S.- Japan Apple Dispute: New Opportunities for Trade
-
Growth Prospects for India's Cotton and Textile Industries
-
Agricultural Trade Preferences and the Developing Countries
-
Food Security Assessment, GFA 16
-
New Directions in Global Food Markets
-
China's Soybean Imports Expected To Grow Despite Short-Term Disruptions
-
Global Trade Patterns in Fruits and Vegetables
-
Food Security Assessment, GFA-15
-
India's Poultry Sector: Development and Prospects
-
International Trade and Food Safety: Economic Theory and Case Studies
-
International Evidence on Food Consumption Patterns
-
Food Security Assessment GFA14
-
Structural Change and Agricultural Protection: Costs of Korean Agricultural Policy, 1975 and 1990
-
China's Food and Agriculture: Issues for the 21st Century
-
Food Security Assessment GFA13
-
Livestock Sectors in the Economies of Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Transition from Plan to Market and the Road Ahead
-
Agriculture in Brazil and Argentina: Developments and Prospects for Major Field Crops
-
Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade
-
Agricultural Policy Reform in the WTO--The Road Ahead
-
Issues in Food Security
-
Food Security Assessment GFA12
-
U.S. Farm Exports to APEC Forum Members Up 23 Percent in FY1995, to Record High
Related Amber Waves Articles
Resource for production
Agricultural research
More information
For decades, Brazil's import-substitution industrialization (ISI) development approach promoted industrial development at the expense of agriculture by keeping food prices low. During the 1960s and 1970s, Brazil used subsidized credit, minimum prices, and government stock accumulation to compensate agriculture for the pro-industrial tilt of its economic policies. Simultaneously, Brazil pursued its long-term national economic development plan to incorporate intensive agriculture systems in the agricultural frontier in the country's Center-West region and theCerradosarea, with concurrent infrastructure investments. Up to the mid-1980s, these policies were also accompanied by increasing government investment in agricultural research and a rural extension program.
With fiscal austerity in the 1990s, Brazil reduced much of the support provided to agriculture. During this time, there was a dramatic economic shift towards market-oriented policy reforms, including trade liberalization, privatization, and opening to foreign investment. In this new environment, the main factor behind the growth of agricultural production was the strong systematic increase in productivity, paired with changes to Brazil's agrarian structure to include large-scale commercial farms and consolidating modern production systems to supply both domestic and external markets. Since 1996, domestic support to Brazilian agricultural producers has been provided through subsidized credit and price support programs.
Domestic support to Brazilian agricultural producers historically has been provided through policies that seek to address three principal objectives:
- Provide subsidized credit for production and investment, with funds offered at below-market interest rates.
- Provide income support to commercial agricultural producers-including individuals, farm cooperatives, and processors-through various intervention mechanisms in the marketing of commodities.
- Support rural development through subsidized credit and income support programs for low-income, small-scale producers and agrarian reform settlers.
Brazil's agricultural policies are implemented by the Federal Government with credit disbursed through the National System of Rural Credit (Sistema Nacional de Crédito Rural, or SNCR) and administered by the Central Bank in coordination with Banco do Brasil, Banco de Crédito da Amazônia, Banco do Nordeste do Brasil, and Banco Nacional de Crédito Cooperativo.
The SNCR credit system provides about one-third of the farm sector credit needs at subsidized, below-market fixed interest rates, with the rest coming from private sources. Economic liberalization has given Brazilian producers access to credit from traders, processors, and input manufacturers, especially for modern, export-oriented sectors like soybeans and cotton.
The amount the Brazilian Government has budgeted for agriculture has tripled since crop year 2002/03 (July to June). The 2011/2012 Agricultural and Livestock Plan allocated US $73.4 billion in credit for production, marketing, investment, and subsistence agriculture, nearly a two-fold increase over the 2007/2008 Plan (see Brazil's Rural Credit Programs Excel icon (16x16) ).
Resources for Production, Marketing, and Investment
Loans are available to finance commodity production and marketing (54.2 percent of total financial resources), farms and processors investment (18.0 percent), agribusinesses (13 percent), and subsistence farms (14.8 percent). About two-thirds of the resources for production and marketing loans come from a reserve that the Government requires banks to set aside for credit lines to farmers, equaling 28 percent of their deposits, with banks being compensated through a Government equalization program that provides some funding to the banks to offset the lower returns they get from lending to agriculture. The remaining production and marketing funds come from other government programs.
Production credit loans are used to buy inputs for planting with a loan period of around 9 months, and are repaid when the production is sold. Subsidized loans for production (currently at 6.75 percent per year) are available to producers depending on the commodity. Other government subsidized investment credit programs charge interest rates of between 6.75 and 9.5 percent per year, while the new Low Carbon Agriculture Program incorporated in the 2011/2012 Agricultural and Livestock Plan charges a 5.5 percent interest rate. These subsidized rates compare to recent market interest rates for farmers in Brazil of between 20 and 25 percent per year.
Marketing credit programs have been heavily used by Brazilian agricultural producers when domestic minimum prices announced by the Government have been significantly below market prices. The value of a marketing credit loan is based on the quantity of output owned by the farmer times the minimum pre-established price for the crop year; the typical loan term is 180 days. The most significant marketing credit program is the Federal Government Loans (Empréstimo do Governo Federal, EFG), which in 2010 disbursed over $5.3 billion for the marketing of most agricultural commodities. Other marketing credit programs also exist, but are currently small compared with the EGF. One is the Rural Product Note (Cédula de Produto Rural, CPR)and the Rural Promissory Note/Rural Duplicate (Nota Promissória Rural, NPR/Duplicata Rural, DR).
In Brazil, commodity price support programs are based on a system of minimum guaranteed prices. The current system of price support was established in 1996 and revolves around auctions of premiums between the minimum and market prices. Minimum support prices for each commodity and the portion of the crop that will be eligible for the program, are announced in the annual agricultural economic plan.
The leading income support program is the Equalizing Premium Paid to Growers(Prêmio Equalizador Pago ao Produtor, PEPRO). This program, principally used by cotton, corn, and bean producers, has been operating since 1996 and allows individual growers or cooperatives to sell the commodities for a return greater than the market price by receiving an "equalizing premium" from the Government. In a reverse auction that occurs at several scheduled points during harvest, farmers willing to accept the smallest premium win the right to receive payments. A second income support programs to aide in the marketing of rice, corn and wheat include the Program for Product Flow (Prêmio para Escoamento do Produto, PEP). The Risk Premium to Purchase Ag. Products/Private Selling Option Contracts-PROPprimarily used by corn and soybean producers was eliminated in 2009.
The Brazilian Government also maintains publicly owned stocks of agricultural commodities acquired through purchasing programs. The programs leading to stock acquisition include the Federal Government Acquisition (Aquisição do Governo Federal, AGF) and the Selling Option Contract of Agricultural Products (Contrato Governamental de Opção de Venda). Through the AGF mechanism (available for cotton, rice, corn, sorghum, wheat, coffee, and beans), the Government purchases the product at the minimum guarantee price (higher than the market price); farmers store the product they intend to sell to the Government in a warehouse accredited by CONAB. The Selling Option Contract of Agricultural Products serves as insurance for low market prices. Individual farmers and/or cooperatives buy or sell option contracts through public auction, pay a price (called a premium) and have the right to sell their production at a pre-set value (called an exercise price), on the date the contract expires. This program has been primarily used by corn and coffee producers.
Investment credit is provided through a variety of programs administered by the National Development Bank (BNDES). The largest is the Programa Modernização da Frota de Máquinas e Equipamentos Agrícolas (MODERFROTA), for agricultural machinery. The program is aimed at medium- and large-scale producers and was an important component of the opening of new production areas in Brazil in the 1990s and helped mechanized Brazilian agriculture.
Brazil's government policy to expand social programs and reduce poverty has increased funding for the National Program for the Strengthening of Family Agriculture (PRONAF). Funds under these programs have increased to $9.1 billion in 2011/2012 from $6.2 billion in 2007-2008. These programs provide subsidized interest rates of between 0.5 to 4.5 percent to low income producers. PRONAF is expected to benefit nearly 2 million low-income agricultural producers, deriving at least 70 percent of their income from agriculture.
Brazil's government policy to expand social programs and reduce poverty has increased funding for the National Program for the Strengthening of Family Agriculture (PRONAF). Funds under these programs have increased to $9.6 billion in 2011/2012 from $6.2 billion in 2007-2008. These programs provide subsidized interest rates of between 0.5 to 4.5 percent to low income producers. PRONAF is expected to benefit nearly 2 million low-income agricultural producers, deriving at least 70 percent of their income from agriculture.
Brazilian agricultural policy instruments and the corresponding annual credit allocations are routinely consolidated in the annual Agricultural and Livestock Plan (Plano Agrícola y Pecuário, PAP) executed by the Ministry of Agriculture (Ministério da Agricultura; Pecuária e Abastecimento, MAPA) and the Harvest Plan for Family Agriculture executed by the Ministry of Agrarian Development (Plano Safra da Agricultura Familiar, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário, MDA).
In addition to Federal Government support, State Governments have at times implemented support programs for development of crop production and agro-processing industries. Programs for farm debt forgiveness and rescheduling with longer repayment terms and with lower interests rates have been regularly made available to Brazilian producers by legislators in the Brazilian Congress.
Agricultural Research
The increasing investment in research has been singled out by MAPA researchers of Brazilian agriculture as an important factor and credited with the rapid technological development of the sector. Agricultural research was carried out through several public and private Brazilian research institutions and universities. But it was EMBRAPA, the Brazilian Agricultural Research Enterprise, a public corporation linked to the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Supply, which played the key role in developing and diffusing new agricultural technologies.
Created in 1973, EMBRAPA's primary task was applied research on cereals, animal production, fruits and vegetables to generate and transfer new technologies, genetic materials, and production practices that would lead to productivity increases. Since its creation and throughout the 1980s, the main focus was regional adaptive research-the adaptation of agricultural systems to the new ecosystems in the new production frontiers, particularly in the semi-arid lands of the Cerrados.
EMBRAPA was also tasked with providing extension services for the distribution of these new technological packages, which included new and improved seeds, the provision of soil correction techniques and implementation of agricultural practices, including the use of new machinery and equipment in traditional and newly developed regions of the Cerrados.
EMBRAPA's research system was centrally coordinated but carried out through 16 commodity research centers, 10 agro-system research centers, 14 regional research centers, and several service and technology transfer research centers located through the country. EMBRAPA receives funding from the Brazilian government and international institutions. The amount of resources allocated to EMBRAPA increased from an average of US $246 million per year (in constant 1993 US$), during the 1976-80 period to over US $450 million per year during the 1990's (also in 1993 US$). EMBRAPA is credited with recommending more than nine thousand technologies for Brazilian agriculture, which significantly reduced production costs and helped Brazil to expand its productive capacity (MAPA, 2010).
One of the most significant contributions of EMBRAPA to the growth of Brazilian agriculture is EMBRAPA's crop varieties role on the Brazilian seed market, in particular for rice, beans, corn, wheat, soybeans, potatoes and cotton. Another instance of EMBRAPA's involvement has been on developing improved grass varieties, and new breeds for cross-breeding cattle with domestic breeds. Funds were also applied to extension services and new farming techniques such as no-till production, crop rotation systems, market information systems, and adaptation of farm equipment to local conditions.
The results of the investments in agricultural research resulted in high productivity advances for crops and animal products. Production of major crops (soybeans, corn, rice, edible beans, and wheat) rose to 54 million tons in 1990, double the level of 1970. During the 1990s, total oilseed area increased 1 percent per year, compared with a decrease of 1.9 percent per year for total grain area, while yield increased 5.2 percent per year, compared with 4.3 percent per year for grains.
More Information
Additional information on Brazil's economy and credit sector is available from a number of sources: