Indigenous peoples
Text
Indigenous peoples
by Richard Sidaway
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children’ (Native American proverb)
In December 2005, Evo Morales became the new President of Bolivia. He was only 46 years old and openly supported the production and use of the coca plant. He also wanted the state to take control of the profitable natural gas industry. But what was really significant was where he came from. He was born into a farming family in the Andes and spent much his life campaigning for the interests of the original inhabitants of the country. He was one of the first leaders of an indigenous people to make it to the top.
There are perhaps 370 million indigenous peoples in 70 countries around the world. They live on 20% of the world’s land, and they contribute 80% of the world’s biological and cultural diversity. For the last few hundred years, however, European colonialism has marginalised them. Europeans gave them diseases against which they had no defences, suppressed their culture and language, and tried to assimilate them into western societies.
Sometimes they almost disappeared from history. Few people today have heard of the Herero of Namibia. Eighty per cent of their population died from starvation a century ago at the hands of German colonisers. In 1803, there were 10,000 people living in Tasmania, but after the British declared war on them twenty years later, only 300 survived. The last Tasman died in 1905.
The main reason for the decimation of indigenous peoples has been to get their land and natural resources. In Colombia, a hundred years of oil extraction has resulted in the pollution of rivers, soil and drinking water. The story is repeated in Ecuador and Peru. In Brazil, the government plan to build five large dams on the Xingu River. These will flood thousands of square kilometres of tribal reserves and destroy much agricultural land.
Often governments have used forced relocation to get the local inhabitants out of the way. In Botswana today it is happening because of diamond mining and tourism. In the islands of Diego Garcia, in the Indian Ocean, the entire population were banished forever in order to build an airbase.
Land has a spiritual significance for indigenous people. In 1985 the Australian government finally recognised this and returned ownership of Uluru (Ayers Rock) to the Pitjantjatjara Aborigines. In the USA, however, the government is planning to store radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, although it is a sacred site for the Shoshone nation.
Businesses often try to take possession of indigenous cultures. Multinational companies wanted to become the owners of traditional knowledge in areas such as food, farming and health. They have tried to create patents on plants and medicines that indigenous people have used for centuries.
Native languages are also disappearing. They were banned in schools for decades. Parents stopped using them to communicate in the home, and so they were no longer passed from one generation to another.
Sometimes families have been affected in more dramatic ways. In Australia, it was government policy from 1900-1972 to forcibly remove aboriginal children from their parents and bring them up in institutions.
Health problems such as obesity, heart disease and diabetes are another feature of indigenous life. The writer Paul Theroux, travelling in the Pacific, noted that most islanders’ diets nowadays consisted of junk food and canned fish imported from Japan thousands of miles away - despite the fact that they were surrounded by water, and fishing had been a way of life for millennia.
So is the election of Mr Morales, in one of the world’s poorest countries, a sign that things are finally getting better? Various peoples around the world now have their own representation. There is a Sámi parliament in Sweden and an Assembly of First Nations in Canada.
Formal Apologies were passed in several Australian State Parliaments in 1998 for the past mistreatment of the Aboriginal population. In Aotearoa/New Zealand, the Treaty of Waitangi Act has made it possible for Maoris to claim back land, fisheries and forest in special courts where they have equal representation with non-indigenous people. The Miskito Indians in Nicaragua have had similar success.
Some Native American Tribes have recently become extremely wealthy because of a change in the law. They can now start casinos on their own land. Some people worry about the morality of this, but some of the profit has been used for improvements in education and health.
The meeting between western and indigenous cultures has not often been a happy one, but perhaps there is hope yet for the continued diversity of humankind.
Task
Try the activity.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Comments
from the point of view 'who annihilated whom'- one should be sincerely and say ' I am, a human being'. but i would like say- no ' I am a human being in wolf's skin'. whatever happens in the World, mostly in Earth except Natural disasters, all are the results of Humanity. Man strives for Power, Wealth, Gold, Earth, Superiority , Domination and etc. and to get his goal he does everything- fights, steals, kills and makes war, not being concerned of others.
its also so with the Indigenous people. Man wants to make his world, destroying the World of others. its just the act of greediness, and inhumanity. live and go forward, but dont make others cry, dont destroy others life....
Most Japanese are genuine because Japan is an island country and was prohibited to trade with other countries in old times. The meeting betwen different culture was not happy one historically, but diversity of human kind is inevitable in this modern world. For example, many European Countries unites as EU. But it is very important to respect their custom and culture each other and not to try rule the partner.
Your texts
Carpetiem writes As long as human beings are alive, there will be indigenous people. A millennia ago they were not indigenous, however they are indigenous now .Who knows, maybe the people who chat via the internet now will be considered indigenous by the people who are living a millennia later. We are now talking about them as though they were uncivilized. We have to put ourselves in their shoes and think for a moment and look at ourselves, the civilized people, then we will see who is civilized. Don’t we treat or kill people just to entertain ourselves? Don’t we destroy people’s lives just to consume a bit more? Why are they disappearing or being killed or being forced to be so called "civilized"? Is it for the sake of human kind? No, unfortunately we are not kind to these human beings .All we are after is power and comfort. We all put on masks to hide our faces. In that case civilization is the mask we wear to destroy these people’s lives.
Ziguigui writes “I suppose that the diversity of humankind will disappear. Due to the possibility of travelling everywhere in the world, and using even more the same standards (information, medias, technical material, etc.), all our societies will slowly be one! I was born in a little valley in the French part of Switzerland. If I have Swiss and French nationality, my grandmothers and my grandfathers are, respectively, English, Italian, Dutch and Swiss! It will be like that everywhere in the world. A flat world for diversity! Sadly it would have been better that mankind never developed its brain too much.
Sakkeer writes While I was going through this passage, I realized all countries in the world are trying to annihilate whatever they want to dispose of. The indigenous people are one of these things. Why are these people always a victim of civilized and powerful people? The majority of them are totally unable to protect themselves. Those who trying to annihilate origins do not differentiate between left and right. Millions of people are being displaced for the sake of development and progress. They are not provided with basic facilities such as water, land, hospitals and schools, for their basic needs.
In India many villages are flooded and many villagers forcefully displaced for the purpose of making dams. Now they don't have the shelter which had already been agreed by the Government. They are the silent victims of development and progress. They can't break the silence; they don't know how to protest against the dilemma which they are suffering. And they don't know how to hate others. The people who have control over the nation's money and wealth are exploiting all the natural resources for their own achievements and goals. Few people come forward to speak out against these brutal policies of government and politics.