We're told that a period of international experience for students is becoming critically important, not just for the student, but also for employers and universities. But what is the evidence? Does it really give students a global perspective and make them more employable? And are we really widening access - aren't these students the ones who would have gone back-packing anyway? What do employers gain? And why would anyone invest time in taking students on placements? What do universities get out of this and what's the cost/benefit here? Couldn't they and their students gain just as much, at a considerably lower cost, from students completing all their studies on campus? This session questions whether there really is a case for student international experience. The jury is out - and you're invited to join the debate and cast your vote.